violence against doctors

INTRODUCTION

Sacrifice is part of the great tradition of medicine, a tradition that compels doctors into one of the most hazardous occupations. The list of dangers is actually quite long; risk for communicable illnesses, both common and rare, stress that leads to extremely high rates of burnout, depression, substance abuse, and suicide that outpaces other professions (of similar level of education, gender, and generation), serious occupational hazards like workplace violence, both physical and verbal. Each and every practicing doctor has been touched by these issues, either directly or as a witness. As per an Indian Medical Association study, more than 3/4^th of physicians have witnessed some form of violence in the workplace. On the other hand, individuals entering the profession are either completely unaware or have only a limited understanding of the potential long-term consequences that are often understated or ignored. Some occupational hazards have indeed been studied, but there is no comprehensive analysis of workplace risk for physicians like those that has been done for other professions, especially those related to workplace violence.

Violence directed against physicians and healthcare workers seems to be a common phenomenon world-wide. However, this phenomenon has been given scarce consideration and minimal lip service not only by the lay public, media, and law administrators, but even by the medical community. As a matter of fact, the subject of aggression and violence against physicians and its remedies does not figure anywhere either in the medical curriculum or continuing medical education. Multiple anecdotal reports suggest that the problem is increasing globally, but systematic data is lacking. However, it is likely to be more prevalent in those health-care settings like India, which were traditionally socialistic but have recently turned to a capitalistic model of health-care.

Although violence is common in many work-place settings, especially those dealing with social and financial sectors, it can under no circumstance be condoned in hospitals. Although in reality, in-hospital violence is just a superficial symptom of a deeper malady afflicting the overall health-care system, hospitals can not be allowed to become battlegrounds for the simple reason that sick people need a peaceful environment where they can get sympathy, empathy, support, etc. At the same time, health-care professionals also need a stable and peaceful environment if they are ever able to give self-less care (rather than worry about their personal safety). On a long-term basis, the threats and violence could have a bad impact on the physician’s psychology, leading to Post-Traumatic Stress Syndrome (PTSD) in the majority of physicians, something which is akin to a problem faced by war veterans. This manifests as a physician feeling helpless, becoming irritable, introverted, and having thoughts of abandoning medicine or even contemplating suicide. Even more stable personalities might be forced to practice defensive medicine, intent on saving their own skin rather than considering the patient.

DEFINITION

Many people think of violence as a physical assault. However, violence in the healthcare setting is a much broader problem; it is any act of aggression, physical assault, or threatening behavior that occurs in a health-care setting and causes physical or emotional harm to a health worker. It can range from telephonic threats, intimidation, actual verbal abuse, physical but non-injurious assault, sexual harassment, and physical assault causing injury; simple or grievous; weaponry attacks, and homicide to vandalism and/or arson. Verbal abuse is the most common type of violence encountered, but there seems to be some gender bias as well, with sexual abuse being nearly exclusive to female workers.

 

FACTORS PREDISPOSING TO VIOLENCE

The root cause of the problem is the growing distrust between the healthcare sector and the lay community, compounded by poor patient-doctor communication. The whole society is getting materialistic and the healthcare sector is no exception to this. With private capital being infused into the healthcare sector, corporate hospitals, the pharmaceutical and device industry, and business professionals in the hospital administrator seats, the mentality of physicians has also changed from charitable to profit-making. Instead of quality of patient care, the focus has shifted to numbers and “targets being achieved” in terms of patients seen in OPD, investigations and therapeutic procedures done, and often the doctor’s reimbursement is based on these numbers. However, healthcare is unlike any other capitalistic profession due to several factors, but the most important is that, for its proper conduct, it relies on empathy and communication skills. Unfortunately, while doctors and healthcare staff are trained in their own technical profession, they often lack training in communication skills or empathy skills. Currently, no medical curriculum teaches communication skills or gives lessons on empathy. The basic instinct of an intellectual is to have freedom, that is, freedom of choice, which comes only through information. While in the internet-age, a lot of information is available online, the patients/attendants still depend on the treating physician to give them accurate and honest information about the cause of the disease, the disease process, the options for investigation and treatment, the course and prognosis, and finally, the costs involved in the therapy. However, when this information is not adequately communicated to them, it leads to trouble. Thus, the crux of the whole problem, in the majority of cases, is a lack of proper communication.

SITUATION UNIQUE TO INDIA

1. general low awareness of health issues.

2. The primary healthcare infrastructure in the country is eroding. Perhaps related to a general lack of awareness, low priority accorded to it, low investment in this area, and perhaps a peculiar tendency to directly consult specialists/super-specialists has led to the fact that patients who could have been diagnosed in the earliest stages of their disease often present at some super-specialist/tertiary hospitals with diseases far advanced, even incurable.

3. Low coverage of the population with health insurance.

4. lack of communication skills in physicians, which contributes to a very tenuous patient-doctor relationship which is especially prone to breaking down into violence.

5. Rudimentary health insurance structure.

WHAT LEADS TO VIOLENCE BY ATTENDANTS/RELATIVES?

1. Physician related factors

2. Misunderstandings: Miscommunication at any level of explanation of etiology, disease course, prognosis, need for investigations and treatment options.

3. Mis-happenings: When the disease course and prognosis are not properly communicated to the patient, if a mishap occurs, the treating doctor and staff may be perceived as callous or inconsiderate.

4. Dissatisfaction with the course of treatment.

5. Disagreement with physician on modalities, options, and course of treatment.

7. Conflict of interest: Inability to obviate the feeling that many doctors prescribe unnecessary investigations and medicines to obtain undue benefits from the medical industry.

8. Perceived lack of communication (collaboration) or inability to share information between doctor and patient

9. Casual opinion: Criticism by other/2^ndopinion doctors.

10. Patient related factors

The second problem is that the patient and their attendants are in the most vulnerable phase of their existence, that is, faced with temporary or permanent disability, even death. In this state, they are fearful, anxious and in doubt. Here, what they require is empathy and human behavior and not challenge by the doctor or staff.

1. In many government hospitals, there is overcrowding, long waiting time to meet the doctors, absence of a congenial environment, multiple visits to get investigations done and then subsequently to consult doctors, the concept of bed sharing by two or sometimes three patients, floor beds, and poor hygiene and sanitation.

2. Even in private hospitals, there could be prolonged waiting times: delays in attention or admission of sick patients, or perceived delays in investigation and treatment.

3. Perceived (and real) lack of availability of doctor (senior doctor). Currently, there is a shortage of trained specialists. Furthermore, even among the available specialists, there is a skew distribution in favor of urban areas. As a consequence, very few experts are available in low-resource settings, which has even led to quacks occupying this medical space.

4. Perceived lack of caring physicians or staff. Many physicians, especially in the governmental sector, are overburdened by the clinical load due to the twin reasons of paucity of staff and the inability of the private sector to cater to the really poor and low middle-class. Hugely overburdened OPDs, casualties and wards in governmental hospitals are a common sight, which contributes to overstretching not only infrastructure but also medical manpower, contributing to a perception of a lack of care by the hospital staff.

5. Altered states of attendants: intoxication, mental illness, severe anxiety or stress.

6. Problems with public hospitals: dysfunctional equipment, poor quantity and quality of paramedical and supportive staff (and doctors, being at the apex, have to take blame for it).

7. Low insurance cover for the general population is also a big contributing factor, being one of the commonest causes of leading a previously middle class family into the poor class. It is common knowledge that most incidents of violence occur at the time of preparing and paying for the medical bill.

8. Low health related literacy. While overall literacy has improved in the country, healthcare literacy still remains very low. Many caregivers fail to understand the disease process and, even more importantly, the available therapeutic options.

9. Hospital related factors

Hospitals are home to medical equipment and facilities, but often do not pay much attention to security. At least most government hospitals in India are deficient in security.

1. Lack of security personnel during casualty, ICU and other risk-prone areas. Lack of police posts nearby, and even when available, ineffective, so much so that it is more often than not completely useless.

2. Lack of security equipment; metal detectors, scanning devices etc.

3. Lack of security protocols. Who will respond when?

4. The percentage expenditure on healthcare is amongst the lowest in the world. This has led to very few government hospitals in the country and it has been estimated that less than 20% of health needs are catered to by government hospitals. Furthermore, even these government hospitals are at present plagued by poor infrastructure and lack of adequate manpower to undertake healthcare. Thus, the majority of the lay public are forced to go to the private sector for their health needs. Despite a few large corporate hospitals, the bulk of healthcare service is provided by small and medium private healthcare establishments (accounting for 7/6^th of private healthcare institutions) which are isolated, disorganized and woefully lack security arrangements.

1. The role of community
   1. Weak and ineffective laws While some laws are present, they are ineffective for the protection and safety of medical personnel in the private arena. In the government sector, while it is a non-bailable offense to assault any uniformed public servant like a government doctor, the rules are hardly ever strictly enforced and the lay public, being aware of this weak implementation, has no qualms about “exacting revenge” on the doctor and the hospital staff in any eventuality of mishap with their patient. Rather, since these acts go regularly unpunished, they provoke mob violence, one incident after another.
   2. Community leaders Another problem could be small-time community leaders/troublemakers – This is more of a problem in government hospitals or employee insurance hospitals that cater to a significant population of the working class (unlike corporate hospitals which deal nearly exclusively with the intellectual or elite class). These individuals might consider the health crisis an opportunity to “show off” their leadership skills, or they may grudge the perceived power enjoyed by physicians (at that point of time) and feel that their own power is in jeopardy and may feel slighted. They may react by organizing others from patients’ relatives and friends, inciting violence against so-called established power, i.e., health-care professionals, including doctors. On the other hand, what the professionals, being an intellectual class, dislike most is ego basing, and thus, the doctors respond back even more vehemently to the perceived slight, starting a vicious cycle.
   3. Lack of faith in the judicial process. In India, the general public does not have adequate faith in the legal process of the country. Society, in general, believes that doctors are often ‘well connected’ and will get away with anything, forcing the ordinary man to take the law into his own hand.

2. The Role of Media

The media is forever in search of a good story. The story of an underdog fighting a huge establishment is ever popular. In this whole schema, poor, defenseless patients become underdogs fighting against the huge and established, but corrupt medical system led by highly intellectual and “powerful” physicians. This is a good recipe for any successful journalistic endeavor, but it gives a very poor image of an average doctor. Thus, the press indulges in the sensationalization of every related news item, often completely ignoring the real facts.

HOW TO ANTICIPATE VIOLENCE IN HEALTHCARE SETTING?

The key is to remain alert to this eventuality. There are certain telltale signs which can be looked for to anticipate any violence, easily identified as the acronym STAMP:

S	Staring/Lack of Eye Contact
T	Tone & Volume of Voice
A	Anxiety
M	Mumbling
P	Pacing

• Undue staring is an important early indicator of possible violence. This is generally deployed on mid-level health workers like nurses to intimidate them into improper action, but if they refuse, it can culminate in violence.

• Lack of eye contact/shifty gaze is another important cue which is reflective of anger and passive resistance, although there could be some cultural reasons for avoiding eye contact.

• The tone and volume of the voice are a very important clue to an impending outburst, but caustic and sarcastic replies with a normal tone are also important.

• Signs of anxiousness, frequently rubbing hands, tapping hands or feet, and non-seasonal perspiration should be accounted for before they reach a dangerous level.

• Signs of substance abuse or drug intoxication should be kept in mind and appropriate steps taken.

• Mumbling, using slurred/incoherent speech, or repeatedly asking the same question or making the same statements are important signs to be recognized. Mumbling can be interpreted as mounting frustration and a cue for violence.

• Pacing is another indication of mounting agitation, as well as staggering, waving arms or pulling away from healthcare personnel attempting to treat them.

HOW TO MANAGE VIOLENCE IN HEALTHCARE SETTING?

At the Time of Violence

If violence is impending or actually occurring,

1. Remain calm in the face of provocation and don’t raise your voice, but try to let things blow over.

2. Obtain all the documentary evidence of violence. It is a good idea to earmark some hospital staff who will take photographs and audio/video records of the violence.

3. Immediately, all medical records of the patient should be photocopied because there is a huge possibility that an interested person/mob could carry away the original record.

4. Inform the legal counsel/lawyer immediately.

5. Inform the police immediately by phone, sending someone to the police post, SMS, but importantly, keep a record of such attempts to contact the law enforcing agency.

6. Identify the troublemakers/community leaders/s inciting violence.

7. Get written, signed statements from all individuals present (physicians, nurses, and other para-medical staff, patients, relatives, and other bystanders) in the context of the violence.

8. Lodge a First Information Report with the police.

9. While registering a complaint, make sure that it is registered under the relevant act, i.e. Protection of Medical Personnel.

10. It is very important not to try to‘settle’ the issue by paying hush money, which seems more like an admission of guilt than anything else.

PREVENTING VIOLENCE IN HEALTHCARE SETTING

Prevention Tips for physicians

1. Better communication: This is the most workable strategy for the intellectual class: Physicians
   1. have to understand that patients and relatives are going through extra-ordinary fear, anxiety, and doubt and may not thus behave rationally. Furthermore, doctors have to understand that patients come from a variety of backgrounds, classes, educational and economic status. Patients
   2. /their caregivers should always be kept in the loop at each and every medical step: investigation, diagnosis, or treatment.
   3. Don’t make the patient feel that the doctor is in a big hurry and that the patient is wasting his time. Rather, devise a strategy to over-come the problems of time constraints suffered by physicians, probably by having more supportive staff specializing in counseling.
   4. Avoid inculcating fear in patients or making them feel that they are somehow responsible for their state (to which patients respond by putting the blame on doctors).
   5. Patient satisfaction comes from being heard and being understood.
   6. In the case of complications/death, a senior doctor should talk to patients/relatives to give them assurance that the best treatment is being/was given to the patient.
   7. Doctor–patient communication is a two-way street. While it is the patient’s right to get accurate medical information, it is their responsibility as well. The way doctors can facilitate this process is by prescribing information, i.e. by providing patients with educational handouts, putting up their own websites, or referring them to health libraries. This way, patients will know more about their conditions and available options and also obtain realistic expectations of what their doctor can do for them. At the same time, it is the patients’/attendants’ responsibility to give accurate information to the healthcare providers and not hide inconvenient facts from them. There should be no use of either hyperbole or, at the same time, under-statement. As far as possible, the exact situation must be communicated.

2. Incorporating discussion on the philosophy of medicine, ethics, and empathy training into the medical curriculum. Medical philosophy needs to be reoriented towards a changed structure and accompanying perceptions of society. The classic parental doctor–patient relationship no longer works. Now it has to be a participatory approach. It has to be effectively communicated that doctors can’t perform miracles. Indeed, they can modify the disease process, but they can not prevent eventual mortality. At best, they can help patients to adjust to the disease, its morbidity and mortality. Likewise, the importance of teaching empathy to budding doctors can not be over-stressed. Studies reveal that good empathy training could lead to good doctors. It is particularly important to show empathy for suffering and sympathy in financial dealings. The patient should be treated as a fellow human and not some abstract problem or worse, made fun of or treated with ridicule.

3. Proper and written consent in word and spirit in the patients’ own dialect and language with witnesses must be obtained before undertaking major investigations or treatments, especially of interventional nature. The consent should delve into the purpose of investigation/intervention, its possible outcome, clearly detailing commonly occurring life-threatening/non-life-threatening complications, the available alternatives, and the advantages/disadvantages of each one of them. If the patient refuses, the consequences of refusal must be discussed and mentioned explicitly in the consent form. While performing an intervention, only those procedures are done for which consent has been obtained unless it is life-saving.

4. A second opinion should be given very carefully, with a careful choice of words. At the same time, patients may be encouraged to seek a second opinion as a strategy to build confidence. If the second opinion is different from your own opinion, the reasons for the difference must be discussed and the final choice strictly left to the patients/care-givers.

5. An effective management strategy should be put in place: a damage control plan when violence against heath staff seems imminent (not to react tit for tat – anger for anger) and address patient grievances.

6. Give a sense of security to the patient and relatives: a sense that everything is going as per plan. In other words, they should try not to frequently change the treatment plan as well as the cost. The cost of managing complications should, as far as possible, be incorporated into the initial cost.

7. It is important never to over-reach in attempts to treat a patient. One should realize the limits of what medicine can do as well as the limits of available infrastructure and, most importantly, of oneself. Never do any procedure beyond the scope of one’s training and facilities. The dictum “do no harm” holds true for the entire medical specialty.

8. Proper documentation is the key to all successful modern medical practice. Accurate and proper documentation may not directly prevent violence, but after violence, records may be seized by police. Unfortunately, in very sick patients, the focus is entirely on saving life and documents are not in order, but it is always important to keep this in mind, even keep photocopies of important documents because they might be lost in the chaos of ensuing violence. It may be a good idea to employ a staff or at least delegate the work of record keeping to one of the medical staff, so that this aspect is not overlooked.

9. Certain safety habits can be suggested.

10. Pay close attention to your surroundings when you come out of the office; avoid looking at your phone as you walk in the hospital area.

11. Pay close attention to the cars parked around when coming and leaving the hospital premises.

12. Lock the car door immediately after entering.

Preventive Tips for Hospital Administrators

1. Strengthening security.

2. Security personnel (preferably with an army background) should be posted at the entrance of every hospital, ICU, and operation theater and should not let anyone through without checking for appropriate identification.

3. Weapons/weapons like objects should be confiscated before allowing passage to anyone.

4. All attendants must register at the front desk and be given a visitor badge to be worn at all times.

5. Restrict entry of attendants to clinical workplace. No more than two attendants should be allowed with the patient.

6. Establish a Hospital Committee (PRO) specializing in effective communication which can satisfy the patients/attendants.

7. Trained psychologists (counselors) should be available to cater for the emotional needs of patients and their care-givers when required.

8. Since India is a diverse country with several official languages and medical tourism is showing a huge growth, language translators should be available who can prevent incidences of miscommunication.

9. Hospital workplaces should establish a policy for assessing and reporting threats, which would allow employers to track them to see whether prevention strategies are working.

10. Reduce the waiting times for everything and if it can not be done, at least explain why these times are there in the first place.

11. Every hospital should have an emergency algorithm, including an evacuation plan in case of a major act of violence.

12. At the time of designing a hospital, attention should be directed to the workplace’s landscaping, parking lot, and outdoor lighting, keeping in mind security aspects.

13. Displaying information and also the laws governing the safety of doctors up-front:

14. To satisfy the intellectual class

15. To make them aware of the consequences of violence against doctors

16. Involving the media in their activities.

17. Health care personnel must have some training in martial arts, which might save their lives in some instances.

STRONG & EFFECTIVE LAWS: Essential in the fight against violence.

1. Strengthening theLaw against Violence:

It is very important to make ‘violence against doctors’ a non-boilable offence for all medical areas, private or public. There is indeed a need to modify the Indian Penal Code to allow for tougher penalties against perpetrators of such violence.

2. Implementation of Effective Laws:

Often, the real challenge faced in preventing violence against doctors is poor implementation of existing laws. A lack of implementation of existing laws has obstructed efforts to protect doctors from the menace of violence.The law meant for the protection of doctors against violence needs to be stricter and should be implemented promptly and effectively. Law enforcing authorities should be particularly sensitized to this aspect and must realize that their mandate is to maintain law and order. The Rule of Law must be respected and adhered to by society at large.

The Role of the Media in Preventing Violence:

The media has a very important role to play. They should also write positive things about the profession or at least both sides of the issue in situations like this. They should avoid sensationalism and avoid provocative headlines. While in the short term, these kinds of reports get a few eye-balls, in the long run, they might prove counter-productive for society.

Health related Literacy

There is a need to educate not only the lay public but even first-contact physicians in some cases, for example, myocardial infarction. There is a need for clear guidelines and management algorithms for the public and even physicians.

Insurance Schemes

Mass insurance schemes should be offered to cover the whole population. Several states have their own schemes, but national schemes like the currently launched PM JAY scheme and the older RashtriyaAyraogya Nidhi for BPL patients are revolutionary steps in this direction.

CONCLUSIONS

In a predominantly capitalistic society, healthcare and primary education are perhaps the only remaining professions in India which the lay public expects to function on a socialistic model. This would ensure cost-effective, high-class health-care delivery to practically the entire population. However, in reality, medicine (as well as education) is no longer treated as a welfare activity but rather a profit-making venture, at least by the corporate sector. This difference in perception between society in general and the health-care deliverers has led to a serious gap between what is expected and what is delivered on the health front. One of the outcomes of this mis-match is violence against doctors (among other problems), which is seriously threatening the status quo in this profession. On the other hand, while violence on the road (road rage), public places, and even schools is common (though not condone-able), it can under no circumstance be acceptable in hospitals. Hospitals simply can not be allowed to become battlegrounds for the simple reason that sick people need a peaceful environment where they can get sympathy, empathy, support etc. Even health-care professionals need a stable and peaceful environment if they are ever able to give self-less care rather than worry about their personal safety. Thus, if the hospital environment is exposed to violence, its practitioners might start practicing defensive medicine, and focus on saving their own skin rather than treating patients. One of the major factors contributing to violence is not only monetary considerations, but also a lack of communication and failing doctor-patient bonding. The solution lies not only in changing the attitudes and practices of physicians and hospitals, but also in regulators, the media, and even the lay public.

 P Sarat Chandra, Professor, Neurosurgery, AIIMS, New Delhi

Manjari Tripathi, Professor, Neurology, AIIMS, New Delhi

Every time we hear another doctor being assaulted in the hospital, a sliver of shock and disgust goes through people, the medical fraternity, and the media.

We have watched ad nauseam these scenes repeating all over the country. Doctors getting beaten up, hospital equipment being broken down, health workers being assaulted.

The scenes shown on media are deja vu.

The visuals are re-run, again and again.

They did not stop even during the pandemic.

Even for very sick patients with covid on a ventilator.

Why should the healers deserve so much hatred?

Why should such a noble profession become the epicenter for such violence?

Is something fundamentally wrong with medical training?

Or something that we are missing in our public?

Is this because of the gap between the expectations and the reality?

Are doctors soft targets for the institutions and hospitals not meeting up to what society requires?

Spending more than 30 years in this profession, we feel that this angst goes deeper.

Perhaps, we see only the tip of the iceberg.

It is essential to look at a problem pragmatically and concentrate on the solutions and not on the issue.

Everything in health is connected. The whole health infrastructure is one connected, seamless system.

Nothing in a health system is independent.

Fundamentally, the cogs of the wheel are the health personnel, the hospital, and the patient who make up this eco-system.

Each of these elements contributes towards health care both at the local and national levels.

At the local level, the doctors need to be trained personnel. We cannot have untrained professionals dealing with the lives of the patients. But it would also be necessary for doctors to be more trained explicitly in ethics and patient counseling. Unfortunately, there is no separate training for doctors in our profession, specifically on these subjects.

Health systems in some countries, including the United Kingdom, give a great emphasis on this. For example, students from India who wish to pursue a career in the UK need to undergo specific training in this area. The PLAB II examination, which qualifies an international medical graduate to practice in the UK, looks explicitly into these areas.

Coaching is provided to the students on how to speak, interact, and react and understand patients’ needs before the students appear for the PLAB II.

Interestingly, during the PLAB II examination, students interact with actors, and the examiners assess how good the student is in communication skills with the patient. For instance, if a patient is angry, the doctor would be expected to empathize and say, “I can see that you are angry” and not say “I can understand why are you angry” as the English language demands proper vocabulary from the doctor to convey their feelings.

Counseling a patient and his attendants in India could be different. But the same degree of empathy and emotional connection needs to be present between the doctor and the patient. In India, doctors are expected to learn this on the job.

So, how does a young intern who is hardly 22 years old handle the relatives, breaking the news of the death of their near one? How should they react when the relatives break down on hearing the news?

This may be too much for a young doctor to handle, hence the importance of training and including this in the medical curriculum.

Doctors need to have access to standardized operating protocols (SOP’s) and management algorithms at a national level. The National medical council (NMC) or similar apex body needs to create the availability of such material through mobile applications and websites.

We also need to urgently create a national database to store patient information (electronic medical records). So, if a patient goes to any hospital, that hospital should be able to access all the previous investigations and any pre-existing illness of the patient.

From the patient’s perspective, the dissipation of public knowledge over social media, newspapers, and television regarding correct behavior is important. Notice boards should be placed at several places indicating severe penalties for any uncivil behavior. Every hospital should invest adequately in the security and protection of health personnel. Education is very important. The patient and relatives must understand limitations for treatment for every disease. Education pamphlets regarding every disease must be distributed to patient attendants. The prognosis and outcome of the disease must be clearly understood by them. The caregivers cannot expect a cure in conditions which have a limited lifespan. Similarly, complications may arise from treatment of every disease. It is mandatory to record the informed consent properly in the medical records. In addition, it will be important to develop video recorded consent which should be stored by the hospital.

At a National level, alternate judiciary systems should be made available to tackle medical negligence. Senior doctors or even retired doctors should be made to preside over such legal hearings. It may not be a bad idea for senior doctors to undergo training for few years and take a whole career in medical jurisprudence, where doctors can occupy the same role as judges.  Such legal proceedings may occur in separate buildings and not the usual courts to allow expeditious settlement of such cases. This is important as the current legal systems may not cover enough knowledge base to understand and judge the negligence which arises from the complexity of medical pathologies. Hence the need for experts to preside and take such decisions.

One must understand the among all professions, the medical profession is among the longest and most difficult. It takes almost ten years to become a specialist and another decade to gain good experience. This involves years of personal sacrifice, several doctors marrying late, or some even not having children (many of our colleagues had adopted children as they were too old by the time they graduated). Among these, some sub-specialties like neurosurgery, neurology, and cardiac surgery have exceptionally long and grueling hours. By the time a doctor becomes a specialist, several professions are already preparing for their retirement! Hence, it becomes even more critical to make this profession attractive for future generations. Otherwise, we will end up having no one taking medicine or only the best brains and intelligentsia will take up other occupations and not be interested in medicine.

We should now consider the third component of the ecosystem- the hospital.

We, of course, need to increase our national GDP for health care.

But what prevents us from improving the current systems. Some nations spend much less on health care but have better-organized health care systems.

Indian currently has one of most advanced health systems globally. International medical ‘tourism’ is increasing exponentially. Indian doctors are recognized world over for their skills and expertise in view of their vast experience

However, It is imperative for us to understand that we are dealing with two extreme tertiary health care systems in India, both being on either end of the healthcare spectrum. On one hand, we have government institutions, where everything is subsidized or free. They are also places that handle large volumes and crowds. Doctors are usually overworked and have additional teaching and research responsibilities, all this with fixed pay and no incentives. Some medical colleges have their faculty private practicing at their clinics during the evenings. This creates a conflict of interest with their primary job. It is thus a little wonder that the quality of training in most medical colleges is going down.

The government institutions currently form the temples of learning. Therefore, they cannot be compromised as this will lead to a progressive deterioration of healthcare standards as the training of a future generation of doctors will be sub-optimal.

On the other end of the spectrum are the private medical colleges and hospitals. Large corporates usually run them. Most of the smaller hospitals are constructed with a very high debt-to-equity ratio. This places unnatural pressure on doctors to earn more money for the hospital.

So, the doctors joining such places at a young age of their career are faced with a challenge for which they have not been trained for- be part of the revenue generation for the hospital. Opening the medical profession to market forces is a clear and present danger to the profession.

Doctors are healers by profession. They should be given that job only to preserve their efficiency and dignity. Demanding that they should now become financial managers as well will be the last nail on the coffin.

It’s thus no wonder that all the young doctors, after having paid a large sum of  fees for their studies, now may have only one goal in their life- to have a payback time.

We think that it’s time to create a middle path. Something not significantly different from the UK has- a National health service but based on healthy public-private partnership.

So, if it wishes, every private hospital could become part of this health service for which they would get the benefit of joining hands with the government for better security and services without losing control over their hospital.

We have to understand that while health is a human right, no country may not afford to make it free and accessible for every citizen. It cannot be a business venture, but it could be made into a healthy, transparent, and compassionate business.

Every citizen needs access to a sound health system.

Even the richest in the country cannot deny that. And the pandemic has proven it.

Health care cannot happen in one day.

Nor does it mean creating luxurious hospitals with sparkling floors and “ultra-deluxe” rooms (and overpriced charges for treatment).

Hospitals are very different from hotels; the ecosystem is more complex.

It’s the people who are behind it that matter- the doctor, nurses, and paramedics.

If they are happy, the patients will be satisfied.

The happiness of doctors depends not just on financial remuneration.

It depends on the quality of training they receive, the continued medical education they will have, the hospital environment they work in, the sound ethics and principles that they are nurtured in, the bonding they develop with patients, and the contribution they make towards education and research to train the younger generation.

To move forwards after 75 years of independence, it’s time we stopped ignoring the elephant in the room.