A statewide US research confirms that COVID-19 patients suffer poorly following an in-hospital cardiac arrest, although the situation isn’t as catastrophic as reports from earlier in the epidemic suggested.
According to researchers lead by Saket Girotra, MD, COVID-19 patients had poorer odds of survival until discharge and a resumption of spontaneous circulation for 20 minutes or more than those who were not infected with SARS-CoV-2 (University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City). They were also more likely to have delayed defibrillation, despite the fact that the poorer outcomes in COVID-19 patients persisted even in those who got prompt care.
However, while survival among COVID-19 patients in this research was still dismal (11.9 percent), it was better than some had expected based on preliminary small studies from the United States and China, which showed rates of zero to three percent.
That sparked some talk of implementing universal do-not-resuscitate orders for patients infected with the virus, both to avoid a futile effort and to limit healthcare workers’ exposure to COVID-19.
Girotra told TCTMD he isn’t aware of any centers that actually implemented such a policy, and said “our findings suggest that COVID-19 infection alone should not be used as a factor in withholding CPR from these patients. These data should be used for guiding discussions among physicians and their patients and their families regarding their preferences, giving them the probabilities of survival based on the experience of similar US hospitals across the country.”
For the study, published this week in a JAMA Network Open research letter, the investigators examined data from the American Heart Association Get With the Guidelines-Resuscitation registry. The analysis included 24,915 adults (mean age 64.7 years; 39.5% women) who had an in-hospital cardiac arrest in one of 286 participating hospitals between March and December 2020.
Roughly one-quarter (23.7%) had suspected or confirmed COVID-19, a larger-than-expected proportion that “highlights the enormous burden of the COVID pandemic on in-hospital resuscitation care,” Girotra said. Although these patients were younger than those who didn’t have COVID-19, they were sicker, being more likely to have respiratory failure and to be on a ventilator and to have an initial unshockable rhythm.
Even after accounting for those differences, patients with COVID-19 had lower rates of survival to discharge (11.9% vs 23.5%; adjusted RR 0.65; 95% CI 0.60-0.71) and of a return of spontaneous circulation for 20 minutes or more (53.7% vs 63.6%; adjusted RR 0.86; 95% CI 0.83-0.90). Defibrillation of a shockable rhythm was delayed more frequently in patients infected with the virus (36.6% vs 27.7%; RR 1.30; 95% CI 1.09-1.55), but there was no difference between the groups in the timeliness of epinephrine administration.
The poorer survival, however, was consistent across different subgroups, including patients with nonsurgical diagnoses, those in the ICU, and those who did not have delays in defibrillation or epinephrine. “The lower survival is most likely due to the fact that these patients were a lot sicker when they experienced a cardiac arrest compared to patients who were not infected with COVID-19,” Girotra said.
He added it’s unknown what effect more immunizations, which reduce infection severity, hospitalizations, and presumably lower the chance of in-hospital cardiac arrest, would have on these findings, but it’s something he’d like to look into in future research.
He also suggested that the longer-term trend in survival following in-hospital cardiac arrest be tracked.
“Over the past two decades, we have experienced a significant improvement in in-hospital cardiac arrest survival. The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly undermined those gains,” Girotra noted. “It would be important to see whether we can return to the prepandemic levels of in-hospital cardiac arrest survival once the pandemic recedes.”
